<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for VirtualMagicWords</title>
	<atom:link href="http://virtualmagicwords.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://virtualmagicwords.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Musings on the art and business of magic</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 12:17:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Magic Mark-Up Language by The evolution of an effect &#171; VirtualMagicWords</title>
		<link>http://virtualmagicwords.wordpress.com/2008/08/06/magic-mark-up-language/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>The evolution of an effect &#171; VirtualMagicWords</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 12:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://virtualmagicwords.wordpress.com/?p=14#comment-10</guid>
		<description>[...] Parade was a classic and direct effect. I personally found it a regular worker. But it was rather a trick without a premise. Entourage provides an appealing premise, and an extra level of interaction with the spectator eliminating the other &#8216;queens&#8217; too. But does this make the effect more confusing? Twisted Sisters has a very clever premise and in some ways the &#8216;doubling up&#8217; of the method makes the effect seem even more astounding. Perhaps this is a case for some magical markup analysis?! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Parade was a classic and direct effect. I personally found it a regular worker. But it was rather a trick without a premise. Entourage provides an appealing premise, and an extra level of interaction with the spectator eliminating the other &#8216;queens&#8217; too. But does this make the effect more confusing? Twisted Sisters has a very clever premise and in some ways the &#8216;doubling up&#8217; of the method makes the effect seem even more astounding. Perhaps this is a case for some magical markup analysis?! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Magic Books by Magic Mark-Up Language &#171; VirtualMagicWords</title>
		<link>http://virtualmagicwords.wordpress.com/magic-books/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Magic Mark-Up Language &#171; VirtualMagicWords</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 15:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://virtualmagicwords.wordpress.com/?page_id=5#comment-9</guid>
		<description>[...] Magic&#160;Books [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Magic&nbsp;Books [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
